Klorra AI vs PlanSwift

Looking for a PlanSwift alternative?

PlanSwift is software you drive — you import the plans, calibrate the scale, click every wall and door, and assemble the bid yourself. Klorra is built differently. Upload your plans and four hours later get a complete bid package back: takeoff, cost estimate, scope of work, and a conflict report flagging where the architectural, structural, and MEP sets disagree. No measuring, no catalog setup, no exporting to Excel.

Side-by-side

Klorra AI vs PlanSwift at a glance

Klorra AIPlanSwift
Pricing$299 PAYG single bid · $329/mo Builder · $999/mo Pro · 25% off annual · First bid free$1,749/year per user (annual subscription only as of 2025) + $250/year support + per-trade plug-ins
OperatorAI does the work; you reviewYou drive every measurement
Time per bid~4 hours unattendedSeveral hours to a full day, fully attended
Plan readingCross-reads architectural + structural + civil + MEPOne sheet at a time; no cross-discipline check
Cost estimate document✓ Generated automatically — Excel + line itemsExport quantities; build estimate yourself in Excel
Scope of Work document✓ Generated automatically — DOCX✗ Not produced
Conflict / coordination report✓ Flags inconsistencies between disciplines✗ Not produced
Cost-code frameworkShipped — inherited from an active builder, regional rates baked inBYO; you build and maintain your own catalog
Mac supportBrowser-based (any OS)Windows-only (long-standing complaint)
Best forCustom home builders running 1–25 bids/yearEstimators / GCs who want to own every click
The real difference

Three reasons builders switch

1

Speed isn't about clicking faster

PlanSwift markets "Takeoff Boost" — pattern recognition that claims to make the basic workflow up to 95% faster. You're still in the seat for hours. Klorra runs the entire pipeline in ~4 hours, unattended. For a builder bidding 8 jobs a year, that's 8 days of human time recovered.

2

You get four documents, not raw measurements

PlanSwift gives you a takeoff. You then build the cost estimate yourself in Excel, write the scope of work in Word, and try to spot scope gaps in your head. Klorra delivers all four — cost estimate XLSX, takeoff XLSX, SOW DOCX, conflict report DOCX — ready to ship to the client. The unit of value is the finished bid package, not a quantity export.

3

The cost-code framework is already built

The reason most custom builders' estimates drift is that the price catalog is half-finished, out of date, or copied from someone else's job. Klorra ships a complete cost-code framework inherited from an active Naples FL custom builder — regional rates, real assemblies, maintained by people whose money is on the line. PlanSwift hands you an empty catalog and tells you to set it up.

Honest comparison

When PlanSwift wins

We'd rather lose your business honestly than win it on a misleading promise.

You want to own every click. Some estimators need to defend every measurement in court or in a contract dispute. That's a real use case where PlanSwift's manual workflow is genuinely better — every number has a click history. Klorra's output is auditable but the AI made the calls. If defensibility-by-click matters, PlanSwift is the right choice.

You bid commercial trade work with deep plug-in needs. PlanSwift has a mature ecosystem of trade-specific plug-ins (electrical, plumbing, HVAC). Klorra is built for residential custom homes; we don't cover commercial trade-specific workflows. Mismatch.

You need real-time takeoff iteration. A PlanSwift user can change a measurement and see the cost update in seconds. Klorra's 4-hour cycle means iteration is slower. If you want to A/B price your own design changes mid-meeting, the live-click model wins.

Try Klorra on your next plan set.

Upload one plan set, get the full deliverable back in 4 hours. First bid is free, no card required. If it's not better than what you get out of PlanSwift, you've lost nothing.

Get a free takeoff →

See pricing → Klorra pricing · See the math → ROI calculator